These are just excerpts of essays for you to view. Please click on Order Now for custom essays, research papers, term papers, thesis, dissertations, case studies and book reports. Get a custom essay on The purpose of the social initiative by clicking “Order Now” Read the next academic writing “Essay: The link between Morality and God“
The indicated purpose of the social initiative was to develop a defined social construct with a cohesive outcome based on the comprehensive contribution of each individual within the culture of the decision makers and policy developers. The established, counterproductive culture of the social initiative contrasting “irrational” processes” and its established, counterproductive culture, consequentially elicited a “group think” precept that depended on the contribution of each participant’s individual’s culture.
This “group think” precept called for a necessary cultural collaboration of individual contributions and perspectives, to guide and develop a finalized remedy for the “irrational” process. This remedy was necessary to adhere to the overall purpose of constructing a social initiative despite contrasting conflicts.
Conflict has its foundation in the emotions of the individual and the emotions of the institutional structures that facilitate and regulate interactions between various individual’s thoughts and behaviors. Culture, as considered by the identified theorists, elicits collective thoughts, behaviors and “processes” that may often promote the denigration of any personal identity or any institution.
A conflicting culture may encourage “strategic interactions” which influence counterproductive social interactions or even cause meaningless “outcomes” of purposeful collaborations. The article’s correlating social initiative began as a greater, ideological social construct. By acknowledging and overindulging in conflict, the culture ignored and denigrated this ideological social construct by adhering to the process of “strategic interaction.” According to the overall culture of the construct, “strategic interaction” was encouraged, promoting the “irrational processes” or meaningless outcomes that erupted from a concentration on the distrust, suspiciousness and anger of each individual and the contributing cultural of these individuals.