Following these arguments in favor of a regulated compensated donor system it is paramount to note that such a system can only accrue the highlighted economic benefits if it is appropriately modeled. This means that there should be governing principles which out rightly distinguishes it from organ trafficking.
Such a system first of all requires price regulations for kidney fees so as to cater for both the rich and the poor. More often than not arguments against compensations for kidney donors debate that such a system would discriminate the poor or exploit them. However, with a price regulation system there is a likelihood of preventing such incidences. Furthermore this counter argument may not hold as with highly developed countries there is an eminent recognition for personal sacrifices which is also available for the poor. Other factors to be considered include the priority for safety especially for the vendor and recipient. This consideration eliminates the possibilities of incurring further expenses due to aborted transplants. In addition, donors and recipients need to be made aware of the potential risks and outcomes of their actions. In line with this should be an establish rule of law which safeguards interests of both donors and recipients should there be cause to seek redress.
Postrel (2009) has waved an intricate article which not only enlightens the public on the nature of kidney donations but which also creates urgency for a better kidney donor system. A regulated compensation system as proposed by Postrel (2009) will as above discussed accrue economic benefits for the country, sever the gap between demand for kidney donors and supply and at the same time eliminate organ trafficking and transplant tourism. A compensation system will in overall offer more benefits for Americans than the altruism based system.
These are just excerpts of essays for you to view. Please click on Order Now for custom essays, research papers, term papers, thesis, dissertations, case studies and book reports.